A641.5.3.RB- ICT at the Team level

Using the concepts within ICT focused on the team level, reflect on why the Olympic US Women’s Soccer team won so often and the US Dream Team basketball men’s team did so poorly in 2000 and 2004?


When it comes to team building and addressing complex adaptive system that are developed with a multitude of key members a clear alignment of desired outcomes is essential for motivating the collective towards a singular end state. If you don’t splice out the individuality at an early stage of the team forming and norming process then self-awareness will take on a completely new face. The collective really needs to “buy into” the process in order to perform at its peak potential. Since several sports are focal to the superstardom concept during execution an all new perception of teambuilding has taken face in their preparation. This new reality reared its ugly face after the highly anticipated Dream Team dominate the Olympics during back to back appearances. The legacy superstars embodied the emotional intelligence for which was needed to empower the team concept over individuality, but the following teams missed it altogether.

Limpert (2012) explains that “the fall of the Dream Team can be explained simply: Its members played like stars, not like a team, resting on their successes, not the task at hand. Some would say the Dream Team began to take its dominance for granted.” It has been both highly publicized and scrutinized how many times LeBron James used the word “I” during after game interviews versus gold winning Captain Carli Anne Lloyd used the word “we and team.” It was more like watching a Harley Globetrotter game versus collective excellence of a body of power players.

This is definitely not the case for the prolific women’s soccer teams that have dominated the Olympics for decades. Their team concept take a whole different approach to the superstardom fame that basketball has been recently known for. These dominate soccer teams flatten the individuality concept which strips each player of their own identity crises and forces them to find hope and compassion for the collective.

If you don’t allow a complex system to have adaptive focus for the betterment of the collective whole then it will ultimately expand multilaterally without a center of gravity. Therefore, misdirection enhances confusion for which dissonance becomes the standard. The superstardom ego is also then enhanced for which many players once again try to dominate with individuality. Once the complex team can no longer be adaptive collectively which enhances overall performance, then unilateral advancement starts to set in which is the final dagger in the downward spiral of collective excellence.
References

Kleio Akrivou, Richard. E. Boyatzis, Poppy L. McLeod, (2006) "The evolving group: towards a prescriptive theory of intentional group development", Journal of Management Development, Vol. 25 Issue: 7, pp.689-706, https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710610678490

Limpert, C. (2012). Lessons from basketball’s Olympic ‘dream team’ Retrieve from https://www.inc.com/olympics/caroline-limpert/how-to-lead-a-team-of-superstars.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A641.1.3.RB - What is Great Leadership